The Language of Special Relativity
نویسنده
چکیده
The Special Theory of Relativity is often interpreted as forcing us to accept a conceptual revolution in our thinking about space, time, and the temporal distinction between past, present, and future. Most importantly, it is claimed that the notion of absolute simultaneity that is embodied in our pre-relativistic thinking about time must be abandoned. Thus, our natural language use of linguistic tense appears to be ill-founded. This constitutes a problem for philosophical analysis: Given that our natural language talk is based on a (supposedly erroneous) conception of absolute simultaneity, can we analyze and clarify such talk? Prima facie, our natural language use of tenses is well captured by tense logic. Can we adjust the machinery of that logical framework such as to meet the relativistic challenge? In my paper, I will first sketch the project of tense logic as a so-called A-theory of time (Section 2). I will then state the relativistic challenge (Section 3). Finally, I will try to answer the challenge by extending the formal framework of tense logic, taking a lead from Arthur Priors idea of a logic of points of view (Section 4). Very much in the spirit of tense logic, I will claim that the special theory of relativity is best interpreted as a multi-modal logic.
منابع مشابه
The Principle of Relativity: From Ungar’s Gyrolanguage for Physics to Weaving Computation in Mathematics
This paper extends the scope of algebraic computation based on a non standard $times$ to the more basic case of a non standard $+$, where standard means associative and commutative. Two physically meaningful examples of a non standard $+$ are provided by the observation of motion in Special Relativity, from either outside (3D) or inside (2D or more), We revisit the ``gyro''-theory ...
متن کاملLogic of Space-Time and Relativity Theory
2 Special relativity 4 2.1 Motivation for special relativistic kinematics in place of Newtonian kinematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.3 Axiomatization Specrel of special relativity in first-order logic 15 2.4 Characteristic differences between Newtonian and special relativistic kinematics . . . ...
متن کاملSpecial relativity in complex vector algebra
Special relativity is one of the monumental achievements of physics of the 20th Century. Whereas Einstein used a coordinate based approach [1], which obscures important geometric aspects of this fundamental theory, many coordinate free geometric languages have since been developed. In [2], D. Hestenes showed how the ideas of special relativity can be elegantly expressed in space-time algebra. T...
متن کاملWigner’s new physics frontier: Physics of two-by-two matrices, including the Lorentz group and optical instruments
According to Eugene Wigner, quantum mechanics is a physics of Fourier transformations, and special relativity is a physics of Lorentz transformations. Since two-by-two matrices with unit determinant form the group SL(2, c) which acts as the universal covering group of the Lorentz group, the two-by-two matrices constitute the natural language for special relativity. The central language for opti...
متن کاملFormal statement of the special principle of relativity
While there is a longstanding discussion about the interpretation of the extended, general principle of relativity, there seems to be a consensus that the special principle of relativity is absolutely clear and unproblematic. However, a closer look at the literature on relativistic physics reveals a more confusing picture. There is a huge variety of, sometimes mataphoric, formulations of the re...
متن کامل